tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post3574748721920451704..comments2024-01-10T17:58:43.380+08:00Comments on 文情并茂: 欧阳文风结婚关你鸟事?凌国文http://www.blogger.com/profile/15743645469961994083noreply@blogger.comBlogger70125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-64710032372237569572011-08-27T00:36:42.275+08:002011-08-27T00:36:42.275+08:00LV 名牌有很多冒牌貨,而這些仿製的也分等級。如果製造這 A 級的 仿製商說正牌的 LV 不完...LV 名牌有很多冒牌貨,而這些仿製的也分等級。如果製造這 A 級的 仿製商說正牌的 LV 不完美,他的 A 貨比 正牌的好,所以可以用 正牌的名義賣,如果LV 公司企圖糾正,那是鞭撻,打壓嗎?<br /><br />為何自認製造的更好的 A 貨 仿製商不要或不敢自創自己的品牌,寧可不避魚目混珠之嫌而用 LV 的名呢?Curiousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-36968230196690014762011-08-26T08:06:35.530+08:002011-08-26T08:06:35.530+08:00To dear Anonymous,
Sry I lose. Every words of Chr...To dear Anonymous,<br /><br />Sry I lose. Every words of Christian is true and holy. Holy Spirit called me to shut up and go live my normal life.<br /><br />Sry mr. Leng for flooding your blog.<br /><br />FSM bless the world. May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage RAmenPaul Hnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-42763563996086986742011-08-25T23:26:27.480+08:002011-08-25T23:26:27.480+08:00"而幸运的我们,为何就不能以慈悲的心去接纳他们,平等地对待他们?让他们享有的基本人权?&q..."而幸运的我们,为何就不能以慈悲的心去接纳他们,平等地对待他们?让他们享有的基本人权?"<br /><br />如 Anonymous August 25, 2011 12:20 PM 說的,你們可以以慈悲的心去接纳那些親兄妹結為夫妻生下一代,親生父女有 ‘你情我願’ 的親密性關係,人與獸的 親密性關係嗎?他們也是人,也有 基本人权呀!<br /><br />如不能,為什麼不能?他們現在也是如同性戀以前的少數一樣呀! 他/她們也會質疑你們假衛道,扮上帝或 佛主或。。。。<br /><br />這個世界的法理 總該有根源,有所本的吧!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-79542084602341287292011-08-25T20:05:10.971+08:002011-08-25T20:05:10.971+08:00Paul H,
"The God's will and holy spirit ...Paul H,<br /><br />"The God's will and holy spirit things? I knew it since I was born." <br /><br />If you have known God's will since you were born, does it mean you know how to read God's word soon you come out of your mother's womb? Then you must be a genius exceeding Einstein's IQ. If you know the 'holy spirit thing' then you should know not to use the word 'thing'. Have you experience it?<br /><br />Load of poppycock!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-88526271999734221682011-08-25T19:36:11.367+08:002011-08-25T19:36:11.367+08:00Paul H,
Christians or those who don't consent...Paul H,<br /><br />Christians or those who don't consent to same sex union or homosexuality also doesn't mean they don't encourage them to come out of the closet either.<br /><br />The point is it is not the right way to condemn people who want to defend their faith but allowing oneself more right to criticize other's faith.<br /><br />It is also not appropriate to comment or even pervert Christians' faith without sufficient knowledge. <br /><br />Christians are taught to be meek, tolerant and patient but it doesn't mean they are not to defend their stand.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-81947789977217111642011-08-25T16:30:15.963+08:002011-08-25T16:30:15.963+08:00其实鼓励同性恋出柜不一定等于鼓励同性恋。其实鼓励同性恋出柜不一定等于鼓励同性恋。Paul Hnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-16099403593053444912011-08-25T15:41:33.484+08:002011-08-25T15:41:33.484+08:00I totally agree with the "而幸运的我们,为何就不能以慈悲的心去接...I totally agree with the "而幸运的我们,为何就不能以慈悲的心去接纳他们,平等地对待他们?让他们享有的基本人权?" and the "Rather than live the principles and teaching of our religion, we often started to play God ourselves and pass judgment on others."<br /><br />Anonymous AUGUST 25, 2011 12:20 PM,<br />I respect your right as a Christian to judge with your value. As for me the so-called doctrine mean nothing to me. Religion to me are imperfect as they were created by human. The God's will and holy spirit things? I knew it since I was born. <br /><br />And yes I do notice that Nietzche was died of mental breakdown and I fully understand what Book of Mormon is. What I want to say is, it works both way. How you see the Book of Mormon, that is how atheist and skeptic sees the Bible.<br /><br />Thanks for your sharing and god bless you.<br /><br />Sry for bothering you.Paul Hnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-91751826161307976682011-08-25T12:20:07.146+08:002011-08-25T12:20:07.146+08:00-- Paul H said, “The values of human being are con...-- Paul H said, “The values of human being are constant changing. Gay in nature is not harmful to anyone else as long as they are happy.”<br /><br />-- Anonymous, August 23, 2011 1:09 said “我本人思想保守,不明同性怎能相愛成夫妻。但我無權去批評別人。如果他們犯子十戒,只有上帝有權。”<br /><br />Few years ago, in Germany, a brother and a sister of the same parents, claimed they love each other and live together and have children. They were charged in court.<br /><br />Not long ago in one of our neighbouring country, a father and his daughter had consensual sexual relationship and were charge in court.<br /><br />Paul H and the above-mentioned Anonymous and those who share their views, can you say heartily that you won't be judgmental in the above-mentioned 'relationship' ( Not the person ) if they were your family members? <br /><br />If you can, then you truly hold your principle of not judgmental in any relationship so long the parties involved are happy. Then be prepared to accept the next group of people who have sex with animals ( Who can tell if the animal is not consent to it? ). This is already happening in this world though they are rare, only few cases being reported because the society does not condone such behaviour. ( Like homosexuality in the old days.)<br /><br />If you cannot, why not? Who set the limit of liberalism? To those people, you are playing God also.<br /><br />Paul H, <br />your quote 'The last Christian died on the cross~Friedrich Nietzsche' <br /><br />Do you know that Friedrich Nietzsche died of mental breakdown?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-26080276858462575532011-08-25T09:40:35.497+08:002011-08-25T09:40:35.497+08:00http://justsharevyou.blogspot.com/2011/08/blog-pos...http://justsharevyou.blogspot.com/2011/08/blog-post_3190.htmlJust Share With Youhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10088477083023439703noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-80173751967088023212011-08-24T12:36:47.208+08:002011-08-24T12:36:47.208+08:00Yian, would you care to sit back and read the foll...Yian, would you care to sit back and read the following?<br /><br />http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=18156:true-christians-support-neither-homosexuality-nor-hatred&Itemid=2<br /><br />I agree that those pastors should not have approached a political party to express issues that is pertaining to their faith. The whole issue has been badly handled and politicized. Since Mr O Y is a 'pastor' and claimed himself as a Christian, so it is the Christian family affair and should be dealt with by the church.<br /><br />Just like you, expressing your support of gay rights, the Christians here are only expressing their support of their faith. Christians are also human being, can't they have their rights to express their understanding of the Scripture? Are you also one who can't differentiate between sin and sinner? Christians referring to sin in the context of their religion, no right to do so? Don't the Muslims and the Jews have the right not to eat pork? Won't you grant the Buddhists' rights to express their views on eating meat and their beliefs? How much is your understanding of Christian teaching and faith or have you researched the subject or just relying on 1 source of information? <br /><br />Can you not look from another angle that the Christians really believe what is written in the Bible and out of love they hope sinners like themselves will repent and enjoy God's blessings? Just like a wife or parents because of love will keep persuading their loved ones from activities that they believe will harm him and the family, don't they have the right to do so? <br /><br />Your post "狗咬不放?每個人有自己選擇的路,那管同性戀是不是天生,這就是他人的選擇。我們可以選擇不接受同性戀,但不應該對他人做出批評" You mean Christians have no right to object their Scripture being twisted according to what they know? So, you don't mind if your house or party's rule being twisted by others or your political enemies? So, it is back to somebody can have more rights than others?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-35546085964038094022011-08-24T10:31:17.949+08:002011-08-24T10:31:17.949+08:00我們在講人權,在提倡人權,在喊著提倡人權,自由選擇宗教和性向不是人權嗎?為何大家在正義凜凜的喊著人權...我們在講人權,在提倡人權,在喊著提倡人權,自由選擇宗教和性向不是人權嗎?為何大家在正義凜凜的喊著人權至上時,在另一方面對同性戀者窮追猛打,狗咬不放?每個人有自己選擇的路,那管同性戀是不是天生,這就是他人的選擇。我們可以選擇不接受同性戀,但不應該對他人做出批評,甚至以宗教的角度去批評,如果有審判之日,就由上帝去判歐陽文風的罪,這是他和上帝的事情,和我們無關啊~那群牧師應該比任何人相信有審判之日,那就由上帝去判啦~為何要透過發表這種言論來判他人的罪,難到歐陽文風就不是上帝的孩子嗎?如果他們說不是,那,請問這是否是上帝的旨意?還是有人自我詮釋上帝的話?yiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-61304417892768585562011-08-24T06:08:56.984+08:002011-08-24T06:08:56.984+08:00The person up stair wrote a very good perspective ...The person up stair wrote a very good perspective using Buddhism principles. Rather than live the principles and teaching of our religion, we often started to play God ourselves and pass judgment on others.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-30260456376397387232011-08-23T21:21:46.431+08:002011-08-23T21:21:46.431+08:00从佛教的轮迥说和三世论可以了解为何佛教(相较其他宗教)从不强调或涉入同性恋和变性课题。
先从...从佛教的轮迥说和三世论可以了解为何佛教(相较其他宗教)从不强调或涉入同性恋和变性课题。<br /><br /> <br /><br />先从轮迥说起,其他宗教信"一世论",既人只有一世(既没有前世和来世)。,佛教却认为人有轮迥,而我们的无数的过去世可能是男,女,畜生。另外也强调一切实相也只是暂时性。所以同不同性这一点也就不怎么强调和著重了。<br /><br /> <br /><br />以佛教的三世论来说(前世,今世,来世),所谓的前世和来世是指你前一秒的你(前世)和后一秒的你(来世)。因为果业(好与坏)的累积是随身的,是从你的无数的过去世累积至你的今世的前一秒。<br /><br /> <br /><br />好了!应该进入正题了!我这里以一个故事和几个问题来解释为何佛教(相较其他宗教)从不强调或涉入同性恋和变性课题。<br /><br /> <br /><br />如果在不久的将来,医学科技足够发达的话。你遇上这样的遭遇,你会如何取舍?<br /><br /> <br /><br />如果你因车祸而自颈部以下全部被毁,医院用仪器为你维持30分钟的寿命。但庆幸的是医生告诉你刚巧有位因脑死亡的同年龄死者愿意捐献整个身躯。如你同意的话将立即进行移植手术。问题是对方是个异性躯体。你要移植脑袋生存下去还是等待死亡?<br /><br /> <br /><br />如果你对家人有太多的不舍而选择移植。那请问你是男还是女?(记住:对方是个异性躯体)这时你又算不算同性恋?(如果你已婚,你算不算和你的另一半搞同性恋?<br /><br /> <br /><br />如果经过了十多年后的适应(异性躯体)后,医院告诉你,已有你原来性别的适合躯体供移植。你又否愿意再次转换性别?<br /><br /> <br /><br />对于同性恋和变性者来说,他们更是处于这种状况。尤其是变性者,他们这一世却要经历两次轮迥,而无法尽忘过去地背负着过去的身份生活。<br /><br /> <br /><br />而幸运的我们,为何就不能以慈悲的心去接纳他们,平等地对待他们?让他们享有的基本人权?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-11409455527404640462011-08-23T13:09:20.261+08:002011-08-23T13:09:20.261+08:00其實同性戀這個課題在美國也爭議不息。但同性戀運動一直曾加。有更多的城市通過同性伴侶合法的法制。但共和...其實同性戀這個課題在美國也爭議不息。但同性戀運動一直曾加。有更多的城市通過同性伴侶合法的法制。但共和黨和荼黨份子也加強反同性合法運動。<br />我本人思想保守,不明同性怎能相愛成夫妻。但我無權去批評別人。如果他們犯子十戒,只有上帝有權。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-70447026369535632932011-08-23T11:58:18.397+08:002011-08-23T11:58:18.397+08:00Paul H,
Is the Book Of Mormon included in the Bibl...Paul H,<br />Is the Book Of Mormon included in the Bible?<br />Indeed when you said there are many kind of faith in Christianity, you have revealed yourself .<br />Go and the read the confession of faith of the Methodist, the Presbyterian, the Assembly of God, the Baptist church, the Calvary church etc will explain clearly to you of the faith in Christianity and ask them to explain to you what is Mormon.<br /><br />Have you read what mtchair ie anonymous of August 21, 2011 5:51 and 6:02 pm quotes from the Bible? If you have, you would not have argued in such manner. If you have not, then read it and make sure you understand the difference between sin and sinner before you 'judge' others' judgment of sin but not sinner which is according to the Bible. <br /><br />Christians are sinners seeking mercy and grace from God and wanting to be sanctified by the power of the Holy Spirit through God's WORD. Therefore, you have totally mistaken them as throwing the stone but 'avoid' what the Lord Jesus told the sinner to repent and sin no more.<br />( John 8:11 "Then neither do I condemn you" Jesus declared. " Go now and leave your life of sin." Take note of the difference between 'leave' and 'live')<br /><br />Let me remind you that Christians take the Bible as the WORD of God and you ought to read the Doctrine and understand the Book as a whole, else it can be very 'dangerous' to quote here and there and ended up in confusion. I can understand your thought because I was once at that stage until the Holy Spirit illuminate my mind and lead me to some very good preachers and their writing on doctrines. If you do not learn and understand doctrine, anybody can find many contrasting statements in the Bible to support one's argument, even the corruptors.<br /><br />Just wish to apologize to Mr Leng for using your blog to do my duty as an ordinary Christian to clarify some points which may not be to the favour of non Christians which is not unusual because that is what make us as Christians and non Christians. Thank you for your tolerance to allow us to express our view here. Best wishes to you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-63393422992571670132011-08-23T09:28:44.497+08:002011-08-23T09:28:44.497+08:00To Anonymous at August 23, 2011 12:35 AM. Sry you ...To Anonymous at August 23, 2011 12:35 AM. Sry you are right, some of the New Testament's Gospel were written by Greeks.<br /><br />Oh and the so called believe that holy bible written through holy spirit things? Let me remind you that there are many Biblical apocrypha that also believed by some people that they are "books proceeding from godly men"<br /><br />And not to mention the Famous Book of Mormon.Paul Hnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-26361591804203310742011-08-23T09:10:21.688+08:002011-08-23T09:10:21.688+08:00What I want to say is why should you define gay as...What I want to say is why should you define gay as a sin as a christian? As long as it doesnt affect me I wont judge him. <br /><br />Anonymous at August 22 11.50, I am not Jesus to judge whether Gay is a sin or not. But for the politician stuff you mention, I am able to and will always judge from a point of man not god nor according to bible.<br /><br />For me Christianity is not perfect. They always tend to judge like they are saints while they aren't hence the story of "let him who is without sin, cast the first stone". The time you judge, you cast the stone.<br /><br />What i want to say to the people who likes to judge using the so-called Christian authority that “The last Christian died on the cross”~Friedrich Nietzsche<br /><br />May god bless every people, AmenPaul Hnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-90406347902849370562011-08-23T08:31:33.637+08:002011-08-23T08:31:33.637+08:00在极端宗教保守势力横行,个人和政治自由受到严重钳制的社会,作为有影响力的博客,国文兄愿意挺身理性为同...在极端宗教保守势力横行,个人和政治自由受到严重钳制的社会,作为有影响力的博客,国文兄愿意挺身理性为同志发言,实属难能可贵。只可惜从读者的回复看来,国文兄的看法仍算是太超前啊(叹)瀚权noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-39394645470806520102011-08-23T01:56:44.103+08:002011-08-23T01:56:44.103+08:00我不赞成同性恋婚姻,也不能接受欧阳文风歪曲圣经真理解释同性恋,更抗议他以基督教牧师身份公开行同性婚礼...我不赞成同性恋婚姻,也不能接受欧阳文风歪曲圣经真理解释同性恋,更抗议他以基督教牧师身份公开行同性婚礼。<br />令我百思不解的是:使用“阿拉”字眼,扣押几千本圣经,基督教国,闯进教会骚扰晚宴等等有关基督教的事件上却不见这几位尊贵的牧师与马华领袖在马华公会召开记者招待会!?健美郭noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-12848800144287417422011-08-23T00:35:14.933+08:002011-08-23T00:35:14.933+08:00Correction to "Luke and Acts were written by ...Correction to "Luke and Acts were written by Jewish men." Should be <br /><br /><br /> "Luke and Acts were written by Jewish men?"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-84964287509343743362011-08-22T23:50:19.541+08:002011-08-22T23:50:19.541+08:00Paul H, please read mtchair ie anonymous of August...Paul H, please read mtchair ie anonymous of August 21, 2011 5:51 and 6:02 pm to answer your "Why". Luke and Acts were written by Jewish men. The church believe the Bible is Holy Spirit inspired and written accordingly.<br /><br />My understanding of Anonymous of August 21, 2011 1:15 condemned sin not sinners and therefore your quotation of Luke 6:37 is out of context. It is dangerous to quote out of context else one day the politicians will tell you not to judge them for their wrongs in public eyes but acceptable to them and their supporters.<br /><br />Hopefully your saying of "The values of human being are constant changing" is referring to tradition, dressing/fashion, not the basic values e.g bribery. According to your logic, the one who bribes and the the one receives bribes are both happy because they get things done according to their desire and so they 'have the right' to tell others that so long they are happy it won't affect others!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-53056631527817970942011-08-22T21:18:09.541+08:002011-08-22T21:18:09.541+08:00It is really not much point to discuss the stand o...It is really not much point to discuss the stand of the church of this same-sex unions in this blog. It is nothing unusual for the church and the world holding different opinions in issues of this kind. Indeed it is expected.<br /><br />For those of you who are open minded and/or really curious/interested of wanting to know more or hear opinions/arguments different from what has been proclaimed or written by Mr A Y, there is an article written by J I Packer :<br /><br />http://www.banneroftruth.org/pages/articles/article_detail.php?344;<br /><br />And other relating articles :<br />http://www.banneroftruth.org/pages/articles/article_select.php?art_search=homosexuality&offset=15;<br /><br />N.B. J I Packer -Board of Governors' Professor, Theology, Regent College. MA, DPhil ( Oxford ) and is one of the preeminent evangelical theologians.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-19153268433739152012011-08-22T20:52:05.485+08:002011-08-22T20:52:05.485+08:00马来西亚佛教界的洪祖丰,以及出了家的我的学姐,妙赞法师,日前也在一场讲座会上,问了这句:“人家同性恋...马来西亚佛教界的洪祖丰,以及出了家的我的学姐,妙赞法师,日前也在一场讲座会上,问了这句:“人家同性恋,关你甚麽事?”<br /><br />我中学时代读佛学,受到贯输不可批评出家人的思想束缚,但以一个佛教徒的身份,也想发表一下我的意见。<br /><br />佛说,人生於世,带着业障而来,唯有修行消除业障,方可登极乐彼岸。<br /><br />佛也说,欲知前世因,今生受者是,欲知来世果,今生做者是。<br /><br />是福还是祸,皆因缘和合。<br /><br />一个人天生有同性恋取向,不应被歧视,但也是业障深重带来的果报。<br /><br />我想,这和基督教说的,人皆有罪,耶稣须以自己的血赦免人类的罪,异曲同工。<br /><br />佛陀知道人类皆有无穷业障,以致不能证得正果,於是委以僧伽使命,助使人类消除业障,离苦得乐。<br /><br />怎麽可以说,各人业障,关你甚麽事?<br /><br />出家人,学佛人,修行人,都在做着不关自己的事,但关着众生的事!<br /><br />政治人物讲的话,那就能听则听,不能听则不听。算了!Uncle Boohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16920030445233902206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-72240387567489675602011-08-22T14:36:08.859+08:002011-08-22T14:36:08.859+08:00西风东渐,就单凭那一句Human rights可食过山矣!西风东渐,就单凭那一句Human rights可食过山矣!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6808698693167487402.post-69102345718983470462011-08-22T12:14:24.734+08:002011-08-22T12:14:24.734+08:00Anonymous at august 21 1.15pm, Why does teaching f...Anonymous at august 21 1.15pm, Why does teaching for Gay's right are against the bible? As a Liberal Christian I must say that there are many kind of faith in Christianity.<br />Bible is not a book that suddenly appeared in the human world. It was written by (Jewish) men as a religion, cultural and historical teaching. The values of human being are constant changing. Gay in nature is not harmful to anyone else as long as they are happy. Besides, Jesus told us that “Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven". (Luke 6:37) Who are we to judge whether that gay is right or wrong?Paul Hnoreply@blogger.com