Wednesday, November 7, 2012

笨蛋,AES的问题在于公信力!


每一次看到交通部长江作汉摆起一副官样重复背诵AES(自动执法系统)如何有效降低车祸率的标准讲稿、同时又板起一副黑脸斥责反对党“政治化”AES课题时,我同样也每一次都会忍不住冲口而出:“笨蛋,问题在于你的公信力!”
嘻嘻,没有问题、没有问题。。。大家不要政治化。。。

安装公路自动执法系统,以电眼监督驾驶人士的时速,进而对超速驾驶及冲红灯的违例行为起到阻吓效果,从而降低车祸率,这么简单的逻辑,谁不明白?谁需要交通部长每天对媒体重复千篇一律的说辞?

问题是,人民反对的不是这个执法系统背后的逻辑思维,而是这个执法系统背后的利益纠葛。我担心有些笨蛋还是看不明白,把问题说得再清楚一点:我们反对的,是为何政府连公路执法都要外包让私营公司来牟利?

私营化也该有个底线,执法本来就是一个政府责无旁贷的任务,而公路交通上的执法权就包括检举和取缔的两大功能,AES最引人诟病之处,正是把这两大执法功能都“度让”给私人公司。

政府执法和私营公司执法的本质矛盾在于,前者是以教育和保护民众为出发,越少人违例,则越接近终极目的;后者则以私人利益出发,越多人被证明违例,则越接近盈利最大化的终极目的。而这也正是AES系统最大的公信力危机所在。

换作你是这两家据说投资了过亿令吉的公司负责人,你的系统决定了驾驶者是否超速或违例,你的公司也掌握了发出传票的权利,而你唯一的利润来源就是公众所缴付的传票罚款。你会尽力地希望驾驶人士因为忘记了不同路段的时速限制而开出更多的传票,抑或努力地让驾驶人士自动减速而发出少一点传票?

而根据媒体所搜集到的资料,设有AES电眼的817个车祸黑区当中,有5个地点的时速限制是30公里、11个地点的时速限制是50公里、143个地区的时速限制是60公里。
 
有驾驶经验的人士都知道,马来西亚的道路最喜欢和你玩“变速”的游戏,这一段路的时速限制本来是90公里,下一段路可以突然下降到60公里,而你一旦变速不及,“刚巧”设在这段路的AES电眼就会马上拍下你超速的玉照,哪怕只是61公里,300令吉的罚款就得乖乖奉献给人家的荷包了。

大家以后驾车要学会特异功能,两只眼睛分别望向不同的方向,一只眼紧盯路旁不懂何时会出现的时速告示牌,另一只眼则紧盯自己驾驶仪上的时速表。可是不管你再步步为营,全国1093个电眼,恐怕总有一个会拍到你。

我拜托交通部长和他的同志们别再以“反对党政治化AES、不顾人民在公路上的死活”来侮辱我们的智慧。请江作汉望一望他的身旁和身后,不少在朝议员,甚至连巫青团不也同样反对AES,难道他们也在煽动人民反政府?

容我再说一次:笨蛋,AES的问题在于公信力啊!

12 comments:

安东尼老爷 said...

要是我是AES的老板,我一定在很多地方设置AES, 时速限制20公里,越低越好,鲁莽车主不小心行驶21公里,就违规了。这样就能够抓到更多的超速野蛮车主,罚单越多,公司进账也越多了。时速限制20公里是为了减少车祸,关心车主的性命。希望车主们能够体谅AES董事们的经营苦心,多多配合才对。

Anonymous said...

一針見血。

moot said...

所谓的AES "成本“, 是 8亿 (800 millions) 。 

只有番薯才会认为, 8亿是天掉下来。 

万能国稍为有点用脑的人都知道,  这 8亿的融资,是另一个马哈大帝型的私囊化把戏 : 
1. 国库给AES 朋党 贷款8 亿
2. 一段时间后,朋党没钱还利息运作。
3. 巫统去开国库, 送多8亿 出去,然后国有化AES.
4. 巫统和朋党又再发财了。

番薯万能马来西亚有那一项超过1 亿元的“ 私囊化"计划, 不是根据这版本走的?

一针 said...

说时 天下无敌
做时 阳萎无力

-一针--

jack said...

为人爸爸,骂人也文雅?

- 枫 - said...

赛城下斜坡 AES limit 50km/h .....
brake 店真好赚 ....


- 枫 -

Anonymous said...

No doubt the people has made a wrong selections in the last general election for which those with low IQ and EQ in no alternative be appointed as Minister to fill the allocations for each component parties. And so called the biggest chinese party has nominated 4 Ministers in cabinet.
However, tracked records of the 4 Ministers performance in the last 4years, unfornately each and every one has failed to deliver or created 'black' remarks in their portfolio, made controversial and 'twisting statements'.
These leaders must be replaced as they are in the bottle neck and unable to produce some creatives ideas of knowledge.
Without new talents and capable young generation to be given an opportunity to contest in 13th general election, the party is likely to sink as the present president has been exhausted and has become negative assets in his party.

A Parent

A Skudai voter said...

MCA has 15 MPs. 4 ministers,4 deputy ministers ( exclude those back- door deputy ministers).So balance 7 MPS. But none of them dare to speak out against AES.As for my MP from Gelang Patah, I could hardly see she speaks in parliament.Yet she wanted to be deputy minister.Sources said she will not be selected for the GE13. So can she tell the people of Gelang Patah how many times she had opened her month in parliament ?

Anonymous said...

The voter of Gelang Patah needs to play a greater efforts by consolidate all man power and resources in the 13th general election so as to ensure a New capable and talent candidate be elected as your representative to voice in the parliament and state assembly on all issues pertaining to the interest of people. After all Gelang Patah has never failed before and it is time for CHANGE.

A Parent

风语者 said...

I think, to counter the criticism of BN idiots against PKR's effort in opposing AES, the best answer from opposition leaders should be:

AES or speed trap etc is only a counter measure. In industrial problem solving terms, we call this low class problem solving. First class problem solving method is to find the real root cause and do actions to prevent it from happening. i.e. preventive measures.

If we do a detail 5-why root cause analysis, it is not difficult to come to conclusion the road safety in Malaysia is spoiled by JPJ.
1. there is no proper education / training system, to ensure the students learn what they need to know about driving.
2. they simply issue international driving license to anybody who pao and belanja them drink kopi
3. lack of post mortem system to under what actually cause the accident. Many of a time it can be due to mechanical failures, but JPJ's crony company Puspakom fail to detect the problem (as usual, you can simply pass puspakom by PAO)

In another word, a regime that has no commitment to stop corruption, will not make AES successful. Hence might as well ask them to keep the money to repay national debt!

Anonymous said...

不要继续误导了。

limit如果是60,那么还可以驾到70km/h,有10km/h的宽限,请纠正。

设立的告示牌,依然我行我素,不顾他人安全的超速横冲直撞,那么这难道可以被原谅吗?

凌国文 said...

没有人会反对公路执法,大家反对的是把执法私营化成朋党的捞钱工具。
如果你想替笨蛋辩驳,拜托你先读懂本文,不然你和笨蛋没有分别。