Monday, February 6, 2012

蔡总,说好的“圆满解决”呢?


马华总会长去年8月不是一脸自豪地宣布苏丹街拆卸风波在他斡旋下已圆满解决的咩?
你看,老蔡甚至还把这篇“给蔡细历响亮掌声”贴在自己的部落格呢!
怎么苏丹街老店课题现在还在继续延烧?

马华的文胆、名笔、资深报人要不要帮忙解释一下:老蔡当天是表错情了,还是只求高调不问成效

66 comments:

jb said...

他作不了主,却又死爱面子!结果?丢脸丢到家了。。。

qym said...

最搞笑的是那些急着出来plp和歌颂的粉丝...

睿 said...

愛穿新衣的馬華黃帝?叫甚麼gor?

凌国文 said...

CD Gor

Anonymous said...

Lao Chai - pa chew cheng!!! Da kee song!!

LA

polo_c said...

连交通部长的权限都低过不是部长的赛哈密,可想而知。。。

polo_c said...

没记错的话是赛哈密是SPAD的阿头,权限还威过交通部长--||

一介草夫 said...

政治人物说的话,减去2个零,再除2还未必是答案。他老人家只是说:解决了他们。

qym said...

蔡細歷 :若中國有意租借給我國‧馬華願領養熊貓..(星洲日报.養狐狸不是更好吗?

一针 said...

高屌问政!

问问而已嘛,我又没说高屌解决。

- 一针--

一针 said...

中国犀牛最好!!
皮够厚,够硬,刀枪不入,也不怕会脸红。

- 一针--

yong said...

One more hero from MCA -Wee Ka Siong. Before the Chinese new year, he held a closed door meeting with the Dong Jiao Zong and the Johor Chinese schools representatives in Johor Baru. He promised a lot of things but non was solved now this group is going to bypass him and wish to have a dialogue with Muhiddin or Najib, This is another example of TALK LOUD NO ACTION !

Anonymous said...

Talk Loud and no action is DAP.What is the DAP MP for Bukit Binatang doing?

一针 said...

久违了

What do you expect from DAP under the current “most democratic” government in the "world"?? They are not the government nor part of the government yet.

当家也好,不当权也好,当权当家也好,政治伙伴也好。If they dare to make the claim when they form the government in the future, we will definitely have more expectations from them. Pressure will be on them if they can’t deliver what they claimed.

RIGHT NOW….. we need to see some manly action from MCA!! but……don’t show us the infamous CD again, pleeeeeeazzzzze

当家不当权?当权不当家?不当权不当家?当权当家?
我也浑了。

- 一针--

James said...

楼上的 Anonymous, 网上的malaysiakini 新闻你不看也罢了, 你没看过这主流报章的报导吗?
http://www.sinchew-i.com/wap/wparticle.php?id=243591&t=&c=my (方贵伦动议辩论武吉免登建捷运被驳回 )

http://tech.sinchew-i.com/sc/node/215630?tid=1 (反對徵地‧設委會捍衛‧隆市蘇丹街業主誓保老店)


若有空的话, 去问问楊有為 (捍衛蘇丹街與武吉免登街委員會主席) 老蔡对苏丹街做的保证现在变的如何?

还有看看为什么华社社团宁可请翁诗杰,方贵伦都不请老蔡, 你自己想想吧. http://www.guangming.com.my/node/125510

Anonymous said...

Since he has already declared that Petaling street matter has been solved under his 'campur tangan', therefore he must be take responsibilities of his words, otherwise he should be knowned as 'Dishonour Party Chairman' and step down by himself

A Parent

马华网络兵团 said...

我们只负责不断repeat“断肢法”,其他事情不关我们事!

Anonymous said...

一针 ,

I totally agree with U, we can't expect anything from DAP because they leader and supporters only know how to talk and no action. In Penang, before GE 12 in March 2008,DAP leader promised to safeguard Kampung Buah Pala if they form the government, DAP also promise to abolish the sungai Nyok toll in Prai. But when they become geovenrmnt, they never honoured the promise. So don't use they excuse that DAP can't save Jalan Sultan because they have not become government yet.

凌国文 said...

掌握决策权的执政党指责在野的反对党无法影响政府决策,这恐怕是一个马来西亚独有的荒唐事。

既然DAP如此无能,不如你来分享一下老蔡如何“圆满解决”了苏丹街老店课题?

还有,在忙着为你的蔡总转移课题之前,不如先回应一下James的疑问,方贵伦在国会动议辩论武吉免登建捷运时,马华在睡觉吗?

Patrick said...

国文兄,我记得你以前写过“只要一提到老蔡,网络残兵就会第一时间送上门”。果然是真的!

James said...

patrick,

没法啦, 这些网络兵团奉命要捍卫老蔡的声望. 受人二分四, 被SHOOT也要顶硬上.

Anonymous said...

蔡细历拍A片啦,干你都傻.

凌国文 said...

灯佑苏丹街活动后,马华的名笔们应该站出来发表评论:“苏丹街征地风波,早在我们英明的总会长蔡细历去年的斡旋下圆满解决了,请大家不要再政治化一个已经解决了的课题”以正视听,免得大家忘了马华的功绩!

Caroll said...

我蛮有兴趣听听蔡总会长的解释。

一针 said...

To Anon February 6, 2012 11:24 PM
That is not an excuse but it’s a FACT in this “world most democratic” country. Every Rakyat with sane mind and reasonable common sense knows that……except those hiding comfortably under the coconut shell busy picking up breadcrumbs.

The solution to your doubt is simple:
Let’s joint hands and put the Pakatan as the FEDERAL government and let them have the FREE hand to run the country WITHOUT any malicious sabotage. (Aren’t we the “world most democratic” country?) We shall see how well they can manage the country and you can enjoy your share of government bashing if they fail by then, like what we are doing now. Deal???

I strongly believe we don’t even need to give them 50++ years to see the difference.... just 10 years will do, honestly.

Don’t pick and choose to “totally” agree with “part” of my sentence. READ THE WHOLE SENTENCES and T~R~Y to comprehend beyond ABC. I ain’t no political animals nor any party supporters and I don’t speak political language a-la-MalaysisaBoleh. Don’t spin my words a-la utusanmalaysia or a-la awangselamat --- that is an insult to your and my intelligence (if you have any left).

“蔡总会长的解释”??
自从上一次高屌之后,基本上他已夹着尾巴消声了。嘴巴正忙着吧?嘿嘿。。。。。。
等主子出声了,万事妥当了,你才能再听到他高屌领功。
等着瞧。

又:各位anon,留下大名吧,那怕是每秒十变,方便称呼交流。泱泱大党,缩头缩尾的,不太好吧?,。

- 一针--

Leslie said...

Just read that Chua Soil Leck denied he will contest in Rasah and said he was victimized by the opponent. I doubt he dares to contest in a chinese majority seat. To the Anonymous who said DAP has done nothing why don't you ask your president to contest in Bukit Bintang ?

Anonymous said...

Dear DAP supporters

U all only know to challenge perople to contest in the seat that u have clear chances to win. So know i challenge Lim Kit Siang or Lim Gan Eng to contest in Malay majority seat u think they are so popular and accepted by the majority race in Malaysia

Leslie said...

Than why don't you ask Najib to contest with Lim Guan Eng or Lim Kit Siang ? That is 1 Malaysia mah ! For a party who claims to represent the Chinese and said the party will withdraw from all government posts if they don't perform better than the 2008 results. Yet the president go and contest in a malay majority seat. So stop calling yourself representing Chinese.

Anonymous said...

Leslie,

Who said President MCA will contest in Malay majority area ? U saw the MCA candidate list for GE 13? DAP aid they are non racial party, so they should not contest only in Chinese area and at the same time claimes that they promote Malasyian's Malaysia. What a joke.

睿 said...

Represent Chinese yet doesn't have the gut to contest in Chinese majority constituency! Might as well change your Associations name to 'Make Chinese Angry' Party.

Anonymous said...

睿,

DAP said they rae multiracial party but yet they only hodong in chinese majority seats. betul-betul pariah better change name to Demon Action Party

Leslie said...

For 55 years ,none of the MCA president dared to contest in Kuaka Lumpur(now Federal Territorary) seats.Why Chua Soil Leck said he was victimized when speculation spreads that he might contest in Rasah? Because he is afraid to contest there! In DAP ,they have Chinese, Malay, India ,Kandazan as their candidates. This is called Malaysian Malaysia, Such a simple thing you also can't understand . How are you going to serve your master well ?

Benjamin said...

I fully support anonymous posted on 7 Feb 2012, 2.38 pm

Anonymous said...

Leslie,
you are wrong, in 1982, President MCA Tan Sri Lee Sam Choon had challenge Lim Kit Siang to contest in Seremban, but LKT ran away. If this time Chua Soi Lek challenge Lim Guan Eng to contest in Rasah or any chinese majority seqt in Johor, i think Lim Guan Eng also will run away.

Leslie said...

Benjamin .you blindly support someone who can not even spell the word correctly,Is there such a word hodong in English ? Ask him to polish up his English before pose a comment ?

Leslie said...

Is seremban in Ferderal Territory ?

林放屁 said...

卖华贪污犯吃大便

林放屁 said...

臭鸡白蔡CD吃焦

Anonymous said...

I would be very glad if Chua CD come over Muar to contest since you mention JOHOR

A Muarian

Fair citizen said...

To be fair to Chua Soil Leck.We should not challenge him to go to any constituency. But as a president of the so called Chinese Association,he should contest in a constituency where the Chinese voters should be more than 70%,Do all readers agree with me ?

老菜 said...

哈哈哈哈看到CCB, 蔡CD吃焦就等于叫卖华的Supporters去吃焦,本来很疲倦的我都经神起来了。

James said...

楼上的February 7, 2012 2:43 PM
的 ANNO

又来旧事重提芙蓉一役 ? 看看WS上次被我SHOOT 得不敢回应, 你有本事就代表他回应吧

http://lengkekmun.blogspot.com/2011/10/blog-post_31.html

睿 said...

Anon of February 7, 2012 2:38 PM,

MCA is a party made up of Chinese members only, am I right? It claims itself as a party which represents Malaysian Chinese and yet it dares not contest in Chinese majority constituency. Other than being a Make Chinese Angry party, can't think of any reason to justify its fear of contesting in Chinese majority area.

DAP is a multiracial party and wonder if any of their constituencies is not multiracial but comprising of only Chinese? Or can I interpret that you can't understand the word 'multi' ? This applies to Benjamin too.

Anonymous said...

To DAP blind supporters,

Don't think your english is prefect. There is only a typo mistake. Why make a big fuss of it ? This is typical DAP leader and supporters behaviour, always like to magnified small mistake.

Anonymous said...

To Fair citizen,

I think you are totally blind and idioit. Can I also challenge LKS Kapal Singh and Lim Guan Eng to contest in a malay majority seat ? Do u think hey will go ? Instead these leaders go and hide in chinese majority seat but claim that they are a multiracial party.

Anonymous said...

睿,

I mean majority chinese seat, i never said chinese only seat. I think you are the one who need to brush up your english. No wonder your support PR and DAp because u have no basci political knowledge at all.

林放屁 said...

Hi idiot, what is Prefect?

Anonymous said...

林放屁 idoit,

I don't understand what you said " Hi idiot, what is Prefect?. You are worse than idoit

睿 said...

Anon of February 7, 2012 4:23 PM,

exactly as I said, DAP is a multiracial party, so it doesn't matter if the constituency is majority Chinese or Malay. But MCA is a single race party, so why doesn't it dare to contest in area which the majority made up of the race you claim to represent?

So, you still don't understand the meaning of 'multiracial' and single race race, eh? What has English got to do with political knowledge? Since you are so well verse in it, please explain.
Else I may just assume your basic political knowledge is to sing the tune of UMNO or Perkasa.

睿 said...

Anon of February 7, 2012 4:23 PM,

Still can't understand the difference between a multiracial party and a single race based party?

As a single race based party, MCA, logically speaking, it should have no fear or qualms to contest in a Chinese majority constituency where it should have the edge over any other party. Since MCA dares not contest in those areas, the logical explanation is it knows it can't get the support of the race it claims to represent? Why? Other than it has Make Chinese Angry, can you offer a better reason to justify your concern?

On the other hand, DAP as a multiracial party, it is to represent multi races. So, it doesn't matter if the constituency is Chinese, Indian or Malay majority, they are all inclusive and it represents them all.

I have to take the liberty to explain the above to you because I have to sign off soon and can't wait for your answer. Since you didn't explain the link between English and political knowledge + the clear demonstration of your lacking in understanding the meaning of 'multiracial', I have to take it that my assumption is correct of your meaning of political knowledge.

林放屁 said...

林放 屁是idiot, 你回应林放 庇那也是idiot.

Fair citizen said...

Anoy of February 7,2912 4:23 pm I only suggested that the porn star president should contest a constituency and you come out with so many names. In fact MCA is a party totally has no right to claim it is representing the Chinese.It has minister who are liar (Remember Liar Liow in the Thong Sin Hospital), a minister with Australia Permanent Citizenship. 3 back-door deputy ministers.1 who lost the state election can also become deputy minister.So the speculation is that the porn star may not contest because he wants to be a senator (safe). Another question I wish to ask you Chua CD as a chairman of Penang Port Commission but he never station in Penang. How he perform his duty, can you answer me ?

Anonymous said...

Fair Citizen,

Lim Kit Siang is MP of Ipoh Barat, but he never saty in Ipoh, can u said he can't perform his duty as MP of Ipoh Barat? Why not u ask this stupid question to Lim Kit Siang or his supporters ?

Anonymous said...

睿,

Who said MCA never contest in chinese majority seat ? In 1995, 1999 and 2004 MCA won in many chinese majority seat. But DAP as a multiracial party never won a seat that have good mixture of Malay, chinese and Indian. What a shame.

Fayr citizen said...

I think your English standard is questionable? A chairman of the Commission is different from the duty of MP. AS a chairman of the Commission he needs to administration of the daily functioning of the port. All right what about the liar, dual citizenship,back door ministers can you answer?

Anonymous said...

怎么又离题了?老蔡自讲自爽的"圆满解决"真的没有人懂的反驳博主吗?真可悲。

Anonymous said...

Fair Citizen,

Your konowledge is so shallow. You even don't know what is the function of chairman and executive chairman and dare to argue somemore.

Fair citizen said...

Why you avoid the other questions? I am patiently waiting for your knowledgeable answer !

Fair citizen said...

Yes my knowledge is very shallow! Can you answer one more question ,is oral sex a punishable offence in Malaysia ?

睿 said...

Anon of February 7, 2012 5:49 PM,

Oh ! What a shame that you can't even differentiate present and past tense yet dare to ask people to brush up their English !!!!????

Did I say MCA never contest in Chinese majority seat?

************************************************
Plse check :

睿 said...
( February 7, 2012 2:04 PM )

Represent Chinese yet doesn't have the gut to contest in Chinese majority constituency....

( February 7, 2012 4:11 PM )

MCA is a party made up of Chinese members only, am I right? .... and yet it dares not contest in Chinese majority constituency. Other than being a Make Chinese Angry party, can't think of any reason to justify its fear of contesting in Chinese majority area.

( February 7, 2012 4:33 PM )

But MCA is a single race party, so why doesn't it dare to contest in area which the majority made up of the race you claim to represent?

...... What has English got to do with political knowledge? Since you are so well verse in it, please explain.
Else I may just assume your basic political knowledge is to sing the tune of UMNO or Perkasa.
************************************************

Now I can understand your not being able to understand the difference between 'multi-racial' and 'single race based' as you don't even know the basic of English, present and past tense!

Btw, you have not answer my question :

** What has English got to do with political knowledge?

Else I may just assume your basic political knowledge is to sing the tune of UMNO or Perkasa.

人生不过如此-沈兴.sim Heng.(1963)。 said...

马华!!!哈哈哈。。。。完蛋!!!

Fair citizen said...

Ha ha ha where is the anonymous who said my knowledge is very shallow. Can't answer my questions and went hiding ! A typical MCA rundog!

RyuWei said...

其实不需要打来打去。我只知道我在马来西亚30多年。第一次有免费的水。虽然不多但可以帮助很多穷人。我们还需要给他们一些时间。他们需要解决的问题多的超出我们的想象。麻花让我们看到他时常在那里放大炮。

凌国文 said...

兜了一个大花园,还是没有一个马华红卫兵可以回答:老蔡不是说苏丹街问题已经被他圆满解决了的咩?

James said...

国文, 就如你所说, 他们会假装看不见, 听不见 , 然后一直重复他们那自以为是的论点.

睿 said...

這就是他們的一貫性的行為,回答不了問題就兜大花园轉移焦點,不然就 ‘發爛渣’ 。這回兜兜轉轉卻露了底,他們那充滿政治學問的老頭脫不了和污桶/土權唱相聲(還是黃梅調?)!