这种朋友去哪里找？
“因为他刚当上领导，急需现金拨到区部”
所以拨了1千万给他；
“因为他要马上交给区部”
所以提了1千万现款给他；
“我没问details，我支持他，相信他。”
所以就算没有收据、就算收钱者没有说明用途，
照样把1千万交给他。
“因为他刚当上领导，急需现金拨到区部”
所以拨了1千万给他；
“因为他要马上交给区部”
所以提了1千万现款给他；
“我没问details，我支持他，相信他。”
所以就算没有收据、就算收钱者没有说明用途，
照样把1千万交给他。
“以后有什么我可以帮到的，再联络。”
给完钱之后，还意犹未尽、难分难舍。
你对你老婆有这么好吗？
我好奇的是，
1千万现款到底有多重？
1千万折换成50令吉钞票
共有200,000 张。
200,000张50令吉钞票
要多少个人来搬？
1千万令吉现款
区部要得那么急
是阿隆找上门吗？
这次没有46亿
更没有125亿
只有区区1千万
不用等老人家每日三问
应该容易解释得多了吧？
40 comments:
如果是100元的钞票，一个成人手掌才拿到十万。一千万，用那种货仓的手推车两三次就可以搞掂了...
直接去问去年最红的那三只青蛙就知道。
那条张员外的枪手，现在还有什么懒话要吠？
职业无分贵贱，行行出状元，楼上的可别职业歧视。
再多的钱到了政治人物手上都不算钱了。一出手不是上亿就是千万。一千万就好像几毛钱的这样就给了出去。钱容易弄来呗！
陈明真的名曲“到哪里找那么好的人？“
现在又听说有人否认拿了钱？
郭富城的名曲“到底有谁能够告诉我？”
比較貼切的是黃一飛改唱版～na是我wu一千萬噢一千萬
還有，那三隻青蛙是今年新鮮出爐的，不是去年
张学友：“一千万个开心的理由，开心的理由。。。”
张庆信出了名有求必应，你不知道吗？
凌国文连这种话都敢写真是脑袋生草咯。。。。。
可以捐一百万给“赵明福遗孤基金”吗？
我是很有诚意的邀问的。。。
欧阳菲菲：爱的路上“千万“里
张员外&翁才子：政治路上“千万“元
政治路上千万元，我们要走过去，别彷徨别犹豫，我们要在一起。。。。。
他们两人唱起这首歌来应该别有一番风味。。。
张庆信说不可以，因为万一钱被行动党私吞了怎么办？谁不知道林吉祥吞了三宝山筹到的钱？
不过，我想知道，如果赵明福儿子以后生活有问题可以找他吗？
波波 said...
還有，那三隻青蛙是今年新鮮出爐的，不是去年
August 13, 2009 12:38 AM
===================================
青蛙的錢也要先找好, 寫好劇本, 等良辰吉日才落閘放青蛙, 算來也得花上半年時間... 時間相當吻合... ;)
Now we have a big show liao, we are 100% sure "at least" of them is lxxr, or 99% sure that both of them are lxxr
Look like no turning back, right?
Jangan silap esok pusing the story, blame reporters salah dengar salah tulis.
Bro leng, you should ask this big shoot to setup a fund (10 millions?) for Bukit Koman case.
Kalau kalah lawsuit, each house still can take RM3333.3333.
Come on bro leng, when is the last time you ever see such a rich and nice guy?
这儿几时变成歌曲创作天地了？
一千万也敢讲出来，真不知量力，在“污桶”里你不知还要排老几呢？
听说这一千万还是分成三次来给，平均每次66，666张50令吉，真好奇不知是哪个牌子的包包能装得下呢？
是james bond bag吗？
银行有那么多现金给你拿吗？一定会劳动几家银行“筹借”先，问有在银行做事的就知了。
他那个御用大专生枪手现在要左闪右躲了，之前不可一世，现在真活该！
奇怪，平时任何一碰到张X信三个字，那条枪手就会马上义务发文告回应。
这次闹到这么热，枪手竟然一番常态，奇怪，奇怪。。。
Haha, we have another explosive 'News' to follow and sounds that this could be resulted in stepping down either one or both leaders if the relevant authority be so efficient as per the 1 Malaysian principals. No play play !!
A Parent
哎呀，是今年3只青蛙。
依我看，政治界里今年“红人”真多，多丑啊！
不平兄，山寨版的辩论王岂敢到正版辩论王的低头来撒野。
I think OTK sang 至少還有你 3 times after taken the money (if 张X信 is telling the truth). Don't jealous, we can sing with Sandy 1128 at Putra Indoor Stadium.
好啦！现在一个说他给了钱；一个说他没收过钱。
这台戏要如何收科？嘿嘿。。。真期待！
翁诗杰：（紧握双手）国文，你真是我的知己，我以前错怪你了。
I guess 10M is just part 1, waiting for part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5, part................
哎喲，我才拿那麽一點兒錢，你們就呱呱叫，大驚小怪。你們以爲當阿頭那麽容易？！這種事情又不是第一次發生，爲什麽單單針對我！！！！
张庆信警告翁诗杰不要咄咄逼人，否则他将逐步“揭开对方底牌”。他表明无惧翁诗杰报警, 坚决不肯撤回他捐献一千万令吉给翁诗杰的指责及道歉，反而挑战翁诗杰“放马过来”起诉他。
他说，他是于去年在朋友(马青总团长魏家祥)要求下，承诺捐献1000万令吉予翁诗杰，充作“马华区会活动基金”。
“翁诗杰可以反驳，不过，我希望他不要逼虎跳墙，逼我揭发更多内幕。”
翁诗杰是今早于马华总部，在一众马华中央领袖的陪同下召开新闻发布会，郑重否认曾收取张庆信的1000万令吉捐款。马青总团长魏家祥并未出席记者会。
我们当然体恤家祥,硬朗作风的他,仍然遮遮盖盖,顾及张庆信.勿受制于庆信,走自己的路,未必就不好.
我还在等着魏博士粉末登场。。。
阿扁嫂说“那些人是那样搬呀搬的硬硬把那些钞票搬进我家我也是被逼收下的呀！”翁总若找不到台词也可以套用这一句不是吗？
道德先生讲的并没有错，脏大鳄企图以一千万来转移视线，而且非常成功。
我不肯定道德先生是否有受贿，但现在大多数人都把焦点放在他受贿与否，而把大鳄最为避忌的自贸区课题给忽略了，相信再过不久，大家都把焦点移到受贿案上，大鳄先生就有充分的时间从新部署新的愚民战略，以此类推，自贸区将永远没有水落石出的一天，大鳄先生也将永远逍遥法外。
其實翁詩傑做了甚麼事, 收過多少錢, 又何須向天下人解釋? ;)
1. The TBH inquest yesterday focused on his right shoe. I received some photograph of the shoe from readers and the same image of the show also appeared on various MSM and online media. I read the line of questions that was posed to the investigating officer. I must say, I am disappointed with the quality of questions being asked.
2. The way the questions was asked as if the lawyers were trying to imply that he was killed elsewhere in the MACC office and he was dragged to the window and then threw out of the window.
3. Let us analyze the sole of the Right shoe and some other picture in MACC office and by looking at the shoe I would not even considering asking such questions. It does not add value.
The picture of the Right shoe showed that heel of the right shoe has come off and there is scraped mark on the sole of the shoe especially on the outer side of the shoe. The upper surface of the shoe is normal. To appreciate the difference one need to compare with pictures of his left shoe that is available on the internet.
4. The police say that he could probably have been dragged on his side and not from behind based on the marks on the shoe heel. This is a flawed thinking. If someone ones to move a motionless body, he would approach the body from behind and put his hand under the arms of TBH and then pull it as such. No one will drag on a motionless body on its side as it simply takes too much effort and difficult to do. Furthermore one would expect other marks on the trousers.
5. The other interesting observation is that such a scrape must have been made against a rough surface. I saw a series of pictures that was sent to me by a reader which showed the various parts of MACC office. The floor is carpeted wall to wall. That means the scrape cannot be made against the floor.
6. The shoe alone tells a lot of story. It goes beyond doubt that TBH did not jump. If he had jumped, the shoe would not be in that shape. From any angle of a jump, and the eventual landing position and the injuries sustained, it is with certainty that I can say he did not jump. So what contribute to the damage to the shoe?
7. My theory is that, TBH was lifeless. Someone (or two) carried his body and threw out of the window. As the body raced down, the right foot scraped trough over a cemented portion of the building external side wall. The force of impact is so hard that the heel came off and a deep scraped mark was left on shoe.
8. The I/O said that there were no marks on the outside of the building on the 14th floor. I do not expect to find it there in the first place. Based on the damaged on the shoe, I expect the momentum to be great. Some readers earlier calculated the speed of fall to be at 80km/hour (if you are reading this, please confirm) and the momentum (mass x velocity) is so great that the shoe just came off and landed about 10 feet to 12 feet from the body.
9. Based on the momentum, the police should be looking for the mark the right foot hit the wall anywhere in between the 14th and 5th floor and not only at the 14th floor. My own estimate suggest that shoe marks could be found anywhere between the 12th and 9th floor on the outside wall of the building. If the police estimated the trajectory of the body correctly, they would be able to find the mark.
10. That basically explains the shoe condition. More importantly, it reemphasized the possibility that an unconscious (or dead) body was thrown out of the 14th floor MACC office.
马青总团长拿督魏家祥坚信“真的假不了，假的真不了”，表示全面支持马华总会长拿督斯里翁诗杰在“Kuala Dimensi有限公司去年拨1000万令吉予翁诗杰”指控的处理方式。他称，媒体在有关议题上发出引导性的问题，例如询问受访者对此事的看法以及是否相信真有此事，可是很多事不是相信就能成真，加上此事与相信与否根本是两码子事。
他强调：“在此议题上，作为马青总团长我全面支持拿督斯里翁诗杰报警的举动，同时通过法律诉讼讨回他的清白，我始终坚信真的假不了，假的真不了，一定会真相大白！”
他是针对网上有人发布翁诗杰和Kuala Dimensi有限公司首席执行员拿督斯里张庆信两人是经过他的介绍而相识发表谈话，同时也为有关指责感到啼笑皆非。他解释，1999年翁诗杰和张庆信都已是国会议员，而他本身则是在5年后才出道。
"如果是我介绍的话，肯定不只一千万献金。以我和马青金主张庆信的交情，只要一句话，万事有商量。别忘了，张庆信与首相关系密切，胡秘书也很了解, 张庆信来自国阵体制，又是国会后座议员俱乐部主席，不是一般商人，背后代表一定的政治力量. 当然，现在局势不妙，希望各位媒体朋友不要再追问我和张庆信的关系， 也不要问我为什么我不评论与Kuala Dimensi有关的课题。现在不是我敢怒敢言的时候。以后再谈。”
i waiting for the show now...
各位网友,
才一千万,有什么大惊小怪，
明天我去顺宝神料店，
买一些"纸币",
就可分多几亿给这一群贪官!
Freedom and Authority
Freedom implies dropping the bondage of the past, abandoning authority, exploring relationships in the present. The following quotations from Krishnamurti may be found relevant.
‘.....If I were foolish enough to give you a system and if you were foolish enough to follow it, you would merely be copying, imitation, conforming, accepting, and when you do that you have set up in yourself the authority of another and hence there is conflict between you and that authority. You feel you must do such and such a thing because you have been told to do it and yet you are incapable of doing it. You have your own particular inclinations, tendencies and pressures which conflict with the system you think you ought to follow and therefore there is a contradiction. So you will lead a double life between the ideology of the system and the actuality of your daily existence. In trying to conform to the ideology, you suppress yourself--whereas what is actually true is not the ideology but what you are. If you try to study yourself according to another you will always remain a second-hand human being.
‘A man who says, "I want to change, tell me how to", seems very earnest, very serious, but he is not. He wants an authority whom he hopes will bring about order in himself. But can authority ever bring about inward order? You may see the truth of this intellectually but can you actually apply it so that your mind no longer projects any authority, the authority of a book, a teacher, a wife or husband, a parent, a friend or of society? Because we have always functioned within the pattern of a formula, the formula becomes the ideology and the authority; but the moment you really see that the question, "How can I change?" sets up a new authority, you have finished with authority for ever.
‘Let us state it again clearly: I see that I must change completely from the roots of my being; I can no longer depend on any tradition because tradition has brought about this colossal laziness, acceptance and obedience; I cannot possibly look to another to help me to change, not to any teacher, any God, any belief, any system, any outside pressure or influence. What then takes place?
Freedom implies dropping the bondage of the past, abandoning authority, exploring relationships in the present. The following quotations from Krishnamurti may be found relevant.
‘.....If I were foolish enough to give you a system and if you were foolish enough to follow it, you would merely be copying, imitation, conforming, accepting, and when you do that you have set up in yourself the authority of another and hence there is conflict between you and that authority. You feel you must do such and such a thing because you have been told to do it and yet you are incapable of doing it. You have your own particular inclinations, tendencies and pressures which conflict with the system you think you ought to follow and therefore there is a contradiction. So you will lead a double life between the ideology of the system and the actuality of your daily existence. In trying to conform to the ideology, you suppress yourself--whereas what is actually true is not the ideology but what you are. If you try to study yourself according to another you will always remain a second-hand human being.
‘A man who says, "I want to change, tell me how to", seems very earnest, very serious, but he is not. He wants an authority whom he hopes will bring about order in himself. But can authority ever bring about inward order? You may see the truth of this intellectually but can you actually apply it so that your mind no longer projects any authority, the authority of a book, a teacher, a wife or husband, a parent, a friend or of society? Because we have always functioned within the pattern of a formula, the formula becomes the ideology and the authority; but the moment you really see that the question, "How can I change?" sets up a new authority, you have finished with authority for ever.
翁诗杰表示，在经过这几天的事态发展后，他本人已经做心里好准备，随时被逼下台. 翁诗杰也透露，他听到消息说，有一个来自砂拉越的国阵成员党目已向国阵领袖提出让该党西渡半岛的建议，以成为全国性的政党，因此把马华弄垮是某些人的议程。
虽然翁诗杰没有说明这个政党的名字，不过他似乎是在指由张庆信领导的砂拉越民主进步党。
与此同时, 魏家祥斩钉截铁的否认曾收取张庆信的献金。他说：“我没有100万令吉，你们别来找我。” 他也以真的假不了，假的真不了这句话来回答问题。
相信再过不久, 什么叉都真假不了伟大总团长就就会改姓吴了......一百万? 好心你啦奇才兄, 打开关门的代价那有那么少?
人不为己, 天诛地灭.
好事一桩。吵得狒狒腾腾的，蛮热闹。如果没有这些闹剧，大马人会知道这些丑闻吗？这只是冰山一角吧了。希望此等闹剧继续上演，可以让我们知道跟多的内幕，给大马人民知道我国的政治有多黑暗。
Post a Comment