Wednesday, June 9, 2010

球不醉人人自醉


到底赌球执照有没有颁发过?
到底谁误导了谁?
到底谁出卖了谁?
到底谁吃了谁的死猫?
到底谁在谁的背后插刀?
到底国阵还要玩多少轮泥沙?
到底政府还要丢多少次脸?
到底一个马来西亚还要上演多少遍罗生门?

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

照成功集团的文告内那赌球执照的批准是“...upon terms and conditions”意味那还不是‘执照’。还没真正的修成正果嘛!

A conditional agreement is not a contract as it's still
"subject to certain fulfilments"; therefore,a contract to contract is no contract.

好啦,现在两方面都没说谎嘛!

大佬:“反秤复民” said...

赌徒说的,世界杯要开赛了,到底政府要不要赌球合法化?不然就去卜基下注。

Anonymous said...

陈志远太高调了,弄巧反拙!

Anonymous said...

會不會是一場show? 譬如,當成功集团發文告後,操作媒體,股價上揚,污桶和公司的大老闆們賣貨,然後囯會里給另一版的說詞,股價下跌,他們又買囘來,大撈一筆?

他們這種做法,如在英,美,甚至新加坡,他們的交易所肯定會暫停成功集团的股票買賣和要調查這公司的。

而大馬這種沒做為的法制是無法吸引外國投資者的。

Anonymous said...

You have ask so many 'Who' with question mark? Yet the answer is 'open bracket' !
Perhaps the people can answer it if it is during a by-electiion.
Or lets us throw the coin for each question to get the answer !!
HAHA

Anonymous said...

前大马糖王郭鹤年家母有训,政商不可勾结。

要做生意就要远离政治,反之亦然,否则会祸国殃民。其智慧令人佩服。