照成功集团的文告内那赌球执照的批准是“...upon terms and conditions”意味那还不是‘执照’。还没真正的修成正果嘛!A conditional agreement is not a contract as it's still"subject to certain fulfilments"; therefore,a contract to contract is no contract.好啦,现在两方面都没说谎嘛!
赌徒说的,世界杯要开赛了,到底政府要不要赌球合法化?不然就去卜基下注。
陈志远太高调了,弄巧反拙!
會不會是一場show? 譬如,當成功集团發文告後,操作媒體,股價上揚,污桶和公司的大老闆們賣貨,然後囯會里給另一版的說詞,股價下跌,他們又買囘來,大撈一筆?他們這種做法,如在英,美,甚至新加坡,他們的交易所肯定會暫停成功集团的股票買賣和要調查這公司的。而大馬這種沒做為的法制是無法吸引外國投資者的。
You have ask so many 'Who' with question mark? Yet the answer is 'open bracket' !Perhaps the people can answer it if it is during a by-electiion.Or lets us throw the coin for each question to get the answer !! HAHA
前大马糖王郭鹤年家母有训,政商不可勾结。要做生意就要远离政治,反之亦然,否则会祸国殃民。其智慧令人佩服。
Post a Comment
6 comments:
照成功集团的文告内那赌球执照的批准是“...upon terms and conditions”意味那还不是‘执照’。还没真正的修成正果嘛!
A conditional agreement is not a contract as it's still
"subject to certain fulfilments"; therefore,a contract to contract is no contract.
好啦,现在两方面都没说谎嘛!
赌徒说的,世界杯要开赛了,到底政府要不要赌球合法化?不然就去卜基下注。
陈志远太高调了,弄巧反拙!
會不會是一場show? 譬如,當成功集团發文告後,操作媒體,股價上揚,污桶和公司的大老闆們賣貨,然後囯會里給另一版的說詞,股價下跌,他們又買囘來,大撈一筆?
他們這種做法,如在英,美,甚至新加坡,他們的交易所肯定會暫停成功集团的股票買賣和要調查這公司的。
而大馬這種沒做為的法制是無法吸引外國投資者的。
You have ask so many 'Who' with question mark? Yet the answer is 'open bracket' !
Perhaps the people can answer it if it is during a by-electiion.
Or lets us throw the coin for each question to get the answer !!
HAHA
前大马糖王郭鹤年家母有训,政商不可勾结。
要做生意就要远离政治,反之亦然,否则会祸国殃民。其智慧令人佩服。
Post a Comment