照成功集团的文告内那赌球执照的批准是“...upon terms and conditions”意味那还不是‘执照’。还没真正的修成正果嘛！A conditional agreement is not a contract as it's still"subject to certain fulfilments"; therefore,a contract to contract is no contract.好啦，现在两方面都没说谎嘛！
赌徒说的，世界杯要开赛了，到底政府要不要赌球合法化？不然就去卜基下注。
陈志远太高调了，弄巧反拙！
會不會是一場show? 譬如，當成功集团發文告後，操作媒體，股價上揚，污桶和公司的大老闆們賣貨，然後囯會里給另一版的說詞，股價下跌，他們又買囘來，大撈一筆？他們這種做法，如在英，美，甚至新加坡，他們的交易所肯定會暫停成功集团的股票買賣和要調查這公司的。而大馬這種沒做為的法制是無法吸引外國投資者的。
You have ask so many 'Who' with question mark? Yet the answer is 'open bracket' !Perhaps the people can answer it if it is during a by-electiion.Or lets us throw the coin for each question to get the answer !! HAHA
前大马糖王郭鹤年家母有训，政商不可勾结。要做生意就要远离政治，反之亦然,否则会祸国殃民。其智慧令人佩服。
Post a Comment
6 comments:
照成功集团的文告内那赌球执照的批准是“...upon terms and conditions”意味那还不是‘执照’。还没真正的修成正果嘛！
A conditional agreement is not a contract as it's still
"subject to certain fulfilments"; therefore,a contract to contract is no contract.
好啦，现在两方面都没说谎嘛！
赌徒说的，世界杯要开赛了，到底政府要不要赌球合法化？不然就去卜基下注。
陈志远太高调了，弄巧反拙！
會不會是一場show? 譬如，當成功集团發文告後，操作媒體，股價上揚，污桶和公司的大老闆們賣貨，然後囯會里給另一版的說詞，股價下跌，他們又買囘來，大撈一筆？
他們這種做法，如在英，美，甚至新加坡，他們的交易所肯定會暫停成功集团的股票買賣和要調查這公司的。
而大馬這種沒做為的法制是無法吸引外國投資者的。
You have ask so many 'Who' with question mark? Yet the answer is 'open bracket' !
Perhaps the people can answer it if it is during a by-electiion.
Or lets us throw the coin for each question to get the answer !!
HAHA
前大马糖王郭鹤年家母有训，政商不可勾结。
要做生意就要远离政治，反之亦然,否则会祸国殃民。其智慧令人佩服。
Post a Comment